Enter a valid URL
Performance-wise, the page is not too bad at all! With a performance score of 94 and impeccable scores in accessibility and best practices, the site's technical backbone is robust. There's a slight drop in SEO score, mostly due to issues with the robots.txt file having 22 errors. But you've got to be kidding me with that document latency! An estimated saving of 810 ms is on the table, and it's a missed opportunity holding the page's potential back. JavaScript bloat is another issue, with 52 KiB of unused code dragging down potential speeds. Font display lags as well, though this one's minor, impacting only 20 ms on perceived load times. Images could also see improvement, with 189 KiB savings possible. Overall, it's a promising page with clear room for optimization.